None
The paper explores the relationship between two logics, effectuation and causation, that are central to decision-making in uncertain environments. The authors argue that these two logics are closely related but have distinct differences. They propose a new framework called the "adaptive loop" to understand how individuals use both logics together to make decisions. The loop consists of three stages: sensing, interpreting, and acting. The authors demonstrate how this framework can be applied to various decision-making situations and help researchers better understand complex decision-making processes. However, the authors acknowledge some limitations, such as the potential for other logics or heuristics to influence decision-making, and cultural or contextual factors that may affect the use of effectuation and causation. Overall, the paper offers a valuable contribution to understanding the interplay between these two logics in decision-making.