Правете неограничени обобщения с AI!
Надстройте до PRO US$ 7.0/m
Няма ограничени функции
None
David Hume and Thomas Reid had a long-standing debate about morality, with Hume arguing that moral judgments are based on emotions while Reid believed they are based on practical judgment. Reid resolved this debate by emphasizing the idea of practical judgment, which implies that moral judgments aim to be objective. This approach also applies to artistic judgment, where there is a right and wrong speed for playing a musical march, but neither are determined by some special realm of fact. Instead, they are determined by experience and deliberation. Reid sets a general conception of the prerogative of man in his adult state to propose and prosecute one great End in Life, and different roads lead to ruin or infamy while others are below the dignity of human nature. Finally, Reid's approach can be categorized into two emphases: constitutive and regulative, as revealed in the history of philosophy.
PRO потребителите получават резюмета с по-високо качество
Надстройте до PRO US$ 7.0/m
Няма ограничени функции
Резюмирайте текста
Резюмиране на текст от файл
Резюмирайте текст от уебсайта
Получавайте по-качествени резултати с повече функции
Станете PRO
David Hume
Hume arguing
Thomas Reid
Hume
moral judgments
practical judgment
Based
long-standing debate
Reid
Thomas
Свързани резюмета
Получавайте по-качествени резултати с повече функции
Станете PRO